At 9:28 AM +0900 2/19/03, Daniel Beck wrote: >>Because I've never had any trouble--and as a rule I avoid going >>over 1394 while capturing. I'd really like to know what they have to >>say. My gut instinct says that internal drives offer the best speed >>and my reading/experience suggests that a master second internal >>drive is always the best to write to. > >Exactly. I'm sorry, I wasn't clear. As I remember they recommend not >capturing to the OS disk. Michael Rubin suggests partitioning if a >second drive is not available. No! No no no no no!!!! Partitioning is EEEEEEEEEVIL. As I mentioned, it makes the disk head do too much work. (Okay, it's not the partition that is evil, but running the capture program on one partition and writing the data on another). I can't imagine that Rubin would have suggested that. And yes, this isn't an iMovie thing--it's any video capture program either Mac or PC. >However, I do believe they would recommend capturing to a second >internal over FireWire if available. Maybe my understanding is a bit >fuzzy, but I do think they (or at least one of them) still suggested >FireWire over the OS Disk. Firewire is a far better solution than capturing to another partition on the same disk, IMO. Very best solution: two very fast internal disks, both configured as master on an extremely fast computer with nothing running in the bg. Program on one, data capture to the other. After that: Master & Slave. Then same disk, same partition. Then internal and FW. Way down at the bottom, two partitions. -- Erica, who's been wrong before and will be wrong again