DVCAM/MiniDV has a data rate of 25 Mbps, or just over 8 MB/sec at about a 5:1 compression ratio. The spec of DVCAM is equal or superior to Betacam in every important category, according to the SMPTE. High definition MPEG 2 (which the prototyped JVC High Def DV uses to record) is spec'd by broadcasters at 19.4 Mbits/sec, which implies tremendous compression, perhaps 30:1. Basically, DVCAM and MiniDV should visually wipe the floor in terms of picture quality with JVC's consumer high def in terms of compression artifact degradation. The JVC High Def DV uses a special (unto JVC alone) recording process because it is recording highly compressed MPEG-2 high definition video onto the MiniDV tape. The fact that it is so compressed will allow ordinary Firewire and ordinary hard drives to handle the content. This is not broadcast quality high def by an stretch of the imagination. The inevitable presence of compression artifacts will also make this consumer high def useless for esoteric things like transfer to film. It's one thing to blow up clean video, and quite another to blow up uncorrectable compression artifacts. SDI video on DVCAM would look soft due to the tremendous up-resolution required, but the JVC consumer HD will shout its compressed origins under such conditions. The BIG question will be -- how will this JVC oddity fare in post production? MPEG - anything has always been intended solely as a distribution (after the Final Cut - pun intended) medium, and has never been consider a viable editorial medium EXCEPT for online compressed streaming content purposes. However, given the fact that a large segment of the television viewing public apparently enjoys highly compressed, horribly artifact laden (wherein a movie like "The Others" has dozens of unintended additional apparitions), the puzzlement becomes - as the viewing public accepts lower quality for quantity, will an independent producer be able to take advantage of this odd JVC concoction without the public taking notice? The near term novelty of HD TV might fuel this possibility as well... Richard Brown On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 11:19 AM, Thubten Kunga wrote: > FireWire is 50 MBytes/sec (400 bits dIvided by 8 bits per byte) while > FireWire 800 is 100 MBytes/sec (800 bits dIvided by 8 bits per byte) > sustained throughput. This is analogous to the old ATA66 vs. the newer > ATA100 IDE spec. I think that we will be needing FireWire 800 to > transfer HDDV from our High Definition DV cameras and desks that will > be coming to market later this year. > http://www.supervideo.com/jvc.htm > > Anyone on the list have any experience with High Definition DV yet? > > k > > On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 11:08 AM, Michael Winter wrote: > >> On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 11:57 AM, XXL wrote: >> >>>> The bandwidth for firewire 400 is so much greater than you need for >>>> dv >>>> capture that there is enough room to pass the video thru the >>>> harddrive into >>>> the computer and then record it onto the drive. >>> >>> According to Maxtor engineers, FireWire 400 is the limiting factor in >>> performance in many drives now. It is claimed that newer drives are >>> faster >>> than the bus. ..just what I read.. Have no idea if it is actually >>> true. >> >> From the research I've done speccing drives, you're information is >> correct, at least with respect to sustained transfers. >> >> However what the previous poster was referring to is that a real time >> video stream has a fixed bandwidth that is much lower than the 400 >> Mbps that Firewire provides. So it doesn't matter how fast Firewire >> or the drives are, as long as they are faster than the DV stream(s) >> (which they are -thanks sb). >> >> -Mike > > > ---------- > <http://www.themacintoshguy.com/lists/MacDV.html>. > Send a message to <MacDV-DIGEST at themacintoshguy.com> to switch to the > digest version. > > XRouter | Share your DSL or cable modem between multiple computers! > Dr. Bott | Now $139.99 <http://www.drbott.com/prod/xrouter.html> > > Cyberian | Support this list when you buy at Outpost.com! > Outpost | http://www.themacintoshguy.com/outpost.shtml > > MacResQ Specials: LaCie SCSI CDR From $99! PowerBook 3400/200 Only > $879! Norton AntiVirus 6 Only $19! We Stock PARTS! > <http://www.macresq.com> >