on 1/29/03 3:45 PM, Thubten Kunga <Kunga at FutureMedia.org> dropped through the skylight and said: > I have a Canon XL-1 and I was disappointed in its performance (lousy in > low light). I do like the improved feature set of the Canon XL-1S > though. I have heard (not experienced because I do all my transfers > with a deck) of incompatibilities with Canon cameras in transferring > video. > > I have been using Sony cameras ever since the early 90's with no > problems to speak of. I think that if you are choosing between those > brands at the lower price points that Sony is better. It's really > personal bias. I like Sony. All my TVs are Sony because the are the > only ones that have the brains to allow audio swap between small and > large PIP windows. And I believe in the Trinitron CRT as a superior way > to display TV. So the Sony brand loyalty bias goes way beyond which is > a better camera. > > I'm sure there are some on this list that swear by Canon. Perhaps they > should come forward to balance out this "debate". > > k Okay, here's a viewpoint from a "lower-end" Canon user. I got a ZR25 for Christmas 2 years ago and have been pretty satisfied with it. For basic "home movie" type shooting (i.e. holidays, kids' sports events, vacations, special occasions, etc.) it's done a pretty good job. I've never had any capture issues with it (500mhz iMac G3 DV SE & iMovie 2.0 --> 2.1.1). I love the size of it. Recently spent 2 weeks in Orlando and often had it in one hand, and my Olympus C720 still camera in the other... yes, a double-fisted shooter! The image stabilizer feature seems to work fairly well. At least I've had no complaints yet. For the price range, Canon's single-CCD camcorders seem like a good value for many consumer-level shooters. On the other hand, I have no cause to disparage Sony products. I've had a Sony TV for a couple years now, and have been extremely pleased with it. I would definitely consider Sony electronics when looking to purchase again. -- Randy Clark hawkgx at planetkc.com Kansas City