[MacDV] Re: The 20inch LCD Conspiracy
Michael Winter
winter at mac.com
Fri Jan 31 19:57:06 PST 2003
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 07:20 PM, Gerhard Kuhn wrote:
> No they do not support anything prior to M.E. but they don't prevent
> you from setting up a Pentium 4 that will boot in DOS, Windows 3.1,
> 95, 98, M.E., and XP.
And when you boot in DOS it supports USB, Firewire, SCSI, Gigabit
ethernet, LCD displays, DVD drives and everything else? Where can I
find this version of DOS?
> On the other hand Apple wants you to use the one O.S. that they think
> you should be happy with. I for one want to be able to make the
> choice as to how I use my hardware and not be told what is good for > me!
Nobody, particularly Apple, is telling you "what is good for (you)".
Does everyone understand that Apple did not go out of their way to
"cripple" new machines so they won't boot OS 9?
Does everyone understand that Apple would have to spend a good deal of
resources developing and testing drivers to make OS 9 run on new
hardware?
Isn't it just possible that the reason Apple needed a new base for
their OS is because OS <9 had so many additions, extensions and patches
to get it to support such a wide array of hardware and API's over the
years that the code was getting nearly impossible to maintain and
troubleshoot, much less add more to?
It could very easily take 10x more in the way of coding and testing to
get Firewire 800 running on OS 9 than it did to get it running in OS X.
They can't just take the code that works in X and paste it into 9. OS 9
simply doesn't have the kinds of clean hooks into every level of the OS
that X does.
I'm sorry, but I just don't see the engineering or business sense in
continuing to support booting into an old OS. All those resources would
be better spent on improving OS X and even making Classic work better
in OS X (IMO).
I apologize for the ranting tone, but every company has to make
business decisions and for every decision there are going to be people
getting left behind. I know it can be painful, because I've been there
enough myself. I just hope people will try to take an objective look at
why Apple makes its decisions and not automatically assume its because
of some dark conspiracy.
-Mike
More information about the MacDV
mailing list