Mark M. Florida wrote: >>I must not have saved the posts from way back, 'cause I can't find 'em. So, >>my apologies for what's likely a common question: >> >>I'd like to make 3 partitions, each to hold an entire DV tape, then leave >>the 4th partiton for data and rendering. How many GB is one DV tape? 20GB? >> >> > >They're a little under 14 GB... But your plan seems like a setup like that >would be too restrictive... What if you want to move some files around -- >then you have to copy from partition to partition and delete the original... >Too much hassle if you asked me... (I know you didn't ask me, but anyway) > >If you've got your heart set on partitioning a hard drive, it's best to >partition the internal startup drive into at least two sections -- one for >your "System" files and Applications and another for your A/V documents. If >you have 2 drives, then just use the second one for A/V but in a single >partition. I think partitioning decreases performance too since it adds >another layer of complexity to read/write requests... > >2 cents. > >- Mark > > > \ Having experimented with partitioning my 80 gig IBM ultra star, I can say that it definitely hindered performance. Whether it made the reads too hard to find or (as I suspect) just made innefficient use of the available heads it sucked. I un-partitioned it and it works fine. I just use folders instead.. Jim > >