> Are you intentionally being argumentative? > No. Sorry if I came across that way. I was just reiterating that the person in the ad was not a "teenager." > Before I saw the commercial, the complaints led me to believe a small > child was blown through a wall. After seeing the commercial live on > television, that clearly is not so. (Which is my point above.) And I agree with your point completely. > I don't > know about you, but most high school students or college aged persons > are full grown men. Well, we can agree to differ about the age of "full-grownedness" (which I would claim happens well after graduation from high school). My point was that the man was not a teenager, which is what I thought you claimed. If that wasn't you, please accept my apology. > I placed the guy in the all important 18-25 > demographic range. > > Quit trying to start fights. Not the slightest bit interested in starting a fight. Just trying to set the record straight. _Chas_ If this country had a national motto, it would be "DOH!"