> -------------------- Begin Original Message -------------------- > > Message text written by Tom Nugent Jr > > "Also, for sports action (ballroom > dancing, in our case), it would seem to be better for reviewing those > high-speed motions." > > -------------------- End Original Message -------------------- > > For reviewing high-speed actions you want *interlaced* video, not > progressive. > Deinterlace the video (for example, using JES Deinterlacer) and you get > double frame rate. Actually, I disagree. The most important factor for freezing motion is not whether it's interlaced or not, but the *shutter speed* of the camera. A higher shutter speed (1/250 sec. or higher) will freeze the motion. And if this higher shutter speed was used with a progressive video signal (or even "quasi-progressive") that should yield the clearest still frames and slow motion possible. 2 cents. - Mark