At 12:58 PM -0700 6/18/03, Jim Heid wrote: > > From: "Mark O'Brien" <rmobrien at mac.com> >> Message-ID: <BB1633CC.987F1%rmobrien at mac.com> >> >> On 6/18/03 2:50 PM, "Erica Sadun" <erica at mindspring.com> wrote: >> >>> So, out of curiousity, I decided to take a break from >>> writing and see if I could make iDVD encode at the >>> bitrate I desired. >> What's the bottom line? Could you put more than 90 minutes of content on a >> DVD with iDVD using this process? > >Whatever the bottom line, I'll bet the quality would be atrocious. > >iDVD's lower bitrate -- the one you get when you have more than 60 minutes >of video -- is 5Mbps, and that's at the low end of the acceptable-quality >level for iDVD's MPEG encoder. Indeed, IMO, the quality is unacceptable for >anything but rank-amateur work. I'd recommend you take a look at some actual samples. I've run through a few different bitrates now and the encoder does much better than I'd expected at the lower bitrates. Don't forget: in many cases, it's not the final Mbps but the encoder that makes the visual difference. -- Erica p.s. And what's wrong with amateur work? A lot of list members are hobbyists. p.p.s. With regard to the 90 minute limit, I haven't yet found a way around it but there are plenty of third party programs that can take the encoded data and produce a DVD.