On 6/25/03 12:12 PM, "Macintosh Digital Video List" <MacDV at lists.themacintoshguy.com> wrote: > I read an article yesterday linked from MacNN about the G5 being not > that fast. According to the article (written by a Mac user), the > VeriTest used by Apple to compare speeds was manipulated a bit to > Apple's favor. Despite this, Apple still didn't win out in everything. > ...[snip]... Anyone else see this and maybe have the link? Yes - the page I think you're referring to is: http://www.haxial.com/spls-soapbox/apple-powermac-G5/ The article seem to raise some valid points about how the tests were conducted to the G5's advantage and to the Pentium's disadvantage. For example: "Apple/Veritest used a special fast malloc library on the G5 benchmark, but did not use it on the Dell/Intel benchmark..." Or "For both the Dell Dimension 8300 and the Dell Precision 650, Apple/Veritest performed the multi-processor "Rate" benchmarks with hyperthreading DISABLED...." Not that it's unheard of for a vendor to try to skew tests of their products in their direction just that if the G5's were as super fast as Apple / IBM claim this should not be necessary. It seems many Apple fans are flaming the heck out of this guy (well what did he expect - praise?). Personally I'd suggest not doing that, rather let's wait until these units are available to _independent_ organizations who can benchmark them in a more open and fair manner. The truth will be obvious then. F -- Frank Flynn Poet, Artist & Mystic