Just for the record: InDesign is a completely new architecture and code base from PageMaker. PageMaker was good, but did have a few limitations that you might encounter while doing complex magazine spreads and other more design-oriented publications - and a lot of good ideas from PageMaker made it into InDesign - but make no mistake about it - its a completely different program. Now back to digital video. My local school got a bunch of eMac's today, replacing aging Blue & White G3 towers - any good resources for elementary school video projects? On Monday, May 19, 2003, at 07:17 PM, Mark M. Florida wrote: > On 5/19/03 5:56 PM, "Matthew Guemple" <mo.og at verizon.net> wrote: > Just a little side note here... > > The funny thing about InDesign is that most of the functionality it > has was > in PageMaker... And the "Pros" thought PageMaker was a "toy" -- but I > always > swore by it's significantly greater ease-of-use and more reliable color > reproduction (from RGB or CMYK TIFF or EPS files)... I know InDesign > has > lots of cool new features like the ability to place native Photoshop > (with > transparency even) and Illustrator files, but the basic interface is > soooo > much like PageMaker... Adobe probably decided to add some features and > change the name of PageMaker to InDesign to thwart off the "anti-pro" > stigma > that went along with PageMaker -- and I never understood why that > stigma > existed... (Quark snobs gave it a bad wrap 'cause it was too easy, > er, um, > I mean made sense)... > > But uh... Enough of the editorial commentary... InDesign is a *great* > application! I don't know if Quark will ever catch up on an > ease-of-use and > feature-set basis... >