on 5/21/03 10:26 AM, David Thrasher at idave at earthlink.net wrote: > I apologize for any irritability. It's just that I'm trying to focus entirely > on video and film production and going into other areas like print distracts > from that. If I can see how it relates to production I don't mind seeing the > topic go off in another direction, but it seemed like the talk was totally > about In Design without any mention on how it would relate to doing a video > production. > > Another factor for me, and out of your control, is that working in a > pre-press/printing establishment is what I do for my "day" job (actually > night) and the merits of Quark vs. In Design vs. PageMaker is the last thing I > want to be reading about. They all have things that cause us fits at the > printing end of things and I'd just as soon not be thinking about work. This > kind of work is what I'm trying to get away from. So please, please talk about > this stuff in the context of making and distributing video projects. There's > enough words to sift through already. Thanks. Well, if we only do that we lose the interesting (for others) cross currents. I suggest we just stick the topics in the subject line and you discard what you don't want to read