PJ wrote: >Now this second split may be the cause of the fps selection (PAL v's >NTSC). Also because video was being used indoors under artificial >lighting, with AC at 60 Hz, (as described previously) in the USA it >was a good idea to go with 30 fps in order to avoid phase problems. >In Europe it made sense to select 25 fps for the same reason. > So, if you travel in Europe with an NTSC camcorder and shoot indoors under artificial light (50 Hz), you'll most likely have an undesirable flickering effect in the video? I never thought of that but the way you explained it makes perfectly good sense. Sean