On Apr 19, 2004, at 8:17 PM, <illovox at comcast.net> wrote: > on 4/19/04 3:14 PM, James Asherman at jimash at optonline.net wrote: > >> On Monday, April 19, 2004, at 06:12 PM, illovox at comcast.net wrote: >> >>>> So, for longevity value, the 1st gen. G4s win -- more memory slots, >>>> upgradeable processor (which rival performance of new G4s with >>>> equivalent >>>> clock speed) > > 1st Gen CANNOT take most upgrades...no AGP. IIRC, the 1st gen. of G4s consisted of both PCI and AGP graphics models. PCI on the 350 MHz model and AGP on the 400 and 450 MHz models. Then when Apple finally started shipping the 500 MHz models, the model with PCI graphics got bumped up to 400 MHz. >>>> and analog audio inputs (for those quick and dirty audio >>>> captures you need to do, and for just more audio I/O flexibility). >>>> >>>> 2 cents. >>>> >> But the 2001 Quicksilver is just more attractive than the other two. >> She's just prettier on my desk. Yeah, that's what I have at home, and although it is nice to look *at*, I'm becoming frustrated with its limitations. (one optical drive bay, 3 memory slots, no analog audio in -- why the hell not????????? "'cause Lord Steve spoke and they made it so..." Jeez, I love using commie computers) joking of course... maybe... >> 1c > > 1c...funny. > > Quicksilvers ARE pretty. I had one...loved to stroke her silky > curves...but > that lack of analogue audio input sealed the deal: OUT!