On Jan 7, 2004, at 3:15 PM, Richard Gilmore wrote: > I don't know about 10.3 but in 9 when I got to 60 of 80 gigs filled on > my hard > drive it seemed to slow down considerably. Where are your numbers > saying it > isn't so? Just my experience. > > Richard Richard - thank you for your willingness to speak in support of bringing data to the table. The debate isn't about MacOS 9 (though systems using HFS+ filesystems will be broadly similar to MacOS X). A number of people have vociferously (not to say stubbornly and illogically) given their opinion that defragmenting disks makes I/O faster in MacOS 10.x. I have challenged this claim, and asked the proponents to produce the data in support of their belief. So far no one has produced any evidence. You understand that it is up to those making a claim to produce the evidence in support, right? The person who disbelieves a claim is entitled to ask for the evidence on which it is based. None has been produced, nor will it be, since the belief is bogus. If you make a claim "A", and someone says "I don't believe you", then you lose the argument if you can't support your claim, e.g. if your response is "bupkiss, whatever works for you" or "prove it". Regardless, when I get the time, I will write some benchmarks to show (one way or the other) that "defragmenting" a disk does nothing of significance for I/O performance for MacOS 10.3. Peter