It seems, then, that the "-R" and "+R" formats relate to using a DVD for data rather than for video. Is that right? Can it be said that in the consumer DVD video market, a DVD has only one standard format? Or has this fragmented into competing formats too? Ron Woodland On Jan 19, 2004, at 11:52 AM, Steven Rogers wrote: > > On Monday, January 19, 2004, at 12:37 PM, Mark M. Florida wrote: > >> On 1/19/04 12:31 PM, Ronald Woodland at woodland at infowest.com wrote: >> >>> Specifically, what value is DVD+R over the DVD-R format for >>> single-sided DVDs. >> >> The DVD+R format allows multiple sessions on the same disc, so you >> could write 4 1 GB sessions until the disc is full. DVD-R discs are >> "closed" or "finalized" after you burn to them just once, no matter >> how much (or how little) data you put on it -- seems silly to me, why >> the heck would the DVD standards group make it that way? I dunno. > > Its a little more complex than that, since I'm using Retrospect to > write multiple sessions on DVD-RWs for backup. But that's the general > idea - the way the disks handle multiple sessions is different. In > practice, I'm not sure there's any difference between the formats in > terms of the way software can use them to provide multi-session > features to the end-user. > > SR