I know there are many who think DivX is a wonderful addition to the repertoire of codecs now available in the video compression arena. But the fact is It's a bastard codec that only further fragments the compatibility landscape. It is based on an early version of the MPEG-4 codec, before the MPEG committee finalized the MPEG-4 standard. Yes, I'm sure improvements have been made by DivX that in some ways is better than MPEG-4. Had those improvements been brought to the MPEG committee, it possibly would have made the MPEG-4 product better. But the DivX people chose to go their own way and develop a proprietary product rather than support an open standard that would further cross-platform, cross-technology compatibility. Divx should not be used or endorsed or encouraged. I say this at the risk of starting a heated exchange. This is my opinion -- I felt it needed to be said. If you don't agree, it's okay and life will go on. ------------------------------------------------- Ronald Woodland -- St. George, Utah 84770 ------------------------------------------------- This email is a natural human product. Slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and should in no way be considered flaws or defects. On Apr 6, 2005, at 5:01 PM, Mark M.Florida wrote: Actually, the DivX website has an HD demo for the DivX codec. Sure, it's compressed, but the DivX codec is really good, and the clips look AWESOME! I downloaded the Madagascar trailer -- I think I had to use VLC to play it, though -- still looks good. http://www.divx.com/hd/ 2 cents. - Mark