The dual 2.5 GHz model is like butter when using Final Cut Pro. I'm currently working on a video project that is similar to one I undertook three years ago. It's nothing that special, but it is illustrative of how far we've come. Back then, I used a 867 MHz G4, single processor, with After Effects and Premiere. It was my first experience with DV cameras and Firewire and it was a nightmare. After Effects was okay but the Premiere software was not robust (lots of crashing) and rendering times were measured in hours. Today, with the current state of hardware and software, I am able to breeze through this project with no surprises. Rendering time is measured in minutes. FCP is easily able to accomplish what it took the two Adobe products to do back then. No question, you want all the horsepower you can afford ...plus big hard drives and lots of RAM. Life is a whole lot more fun now. Ron Woodland On Apr 14, 2005, at 2:48 PM, Timothy Luoma wrote: I'm planning, probably sometime this summer, to buy a Dual G5, mainly to do video work (importing video from ConvertX/Canopus ADVC 110 into iMovie/EyeTV) There is a fairly steep price difference ($900) between the Dual 1.8 and the 2.5. As far as I can see, this is mainly due to the processor speed and the bus speed. Looking at this review http://www.macworld.com/2004/09/reviews/secondg5/index.php It looks like the 2.5 is significantly better than the 1.8 or 2.0 models. The 1.8 model comes with an 80gb hard drive which is no longer large in this day & age, and 256 RAM, which is absurd. I'm wondering if others who have worked with the Dual G5s can comment on their performance. You know what they say about benchmarks ;-) TjL _______________________________________________ MacDV mailing list MacDV at listserver.themacintoshguy.com http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/macdv Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random stuff: http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984