I needed an A/D converter for some of my old VHS tapes and, since I didn't want to invest too much for the low quality videos, I ended up buying a Miglia Alchemy TV DVR for $149.95. It has composite and S-Video inputs and also a TV tuner build in. For the purpose of digitizing VHS it has all the quality I needed. Just as a test I ran a commercial DVD through the S-video to my old Mac and it happily converted it to a Quicktime file (8.6 GB for an hour and 55 minutes with the setting I had there at the time) and the quality is pretty OK considering the very reasonable price of the unit. I have not tried to digitize a commercial VHS tape, but my feeling is that it would do that as well. I was running the DVD on my old 400 Sawtooth and it was working all the way on the max, processor running between 92 to 97%, occasionally maxing at 100 (no easily detectable drop-out though). The unit is compatible also with G5, but I haven't tried that yet, because I have other things I want to do on my G5 and seldom would have time to tie it for long digitizing runs. It says in the package that "Full screen MPEG-4 requires G4/1GHz". For the purpose I acquired the unit, it performs in a satisfactory way and also gives me an opportunity to record TV programs, should I need that function. It also has iCal scheduling and TitanTV support (haven't tried either one yet). Rauno. Nick Scalise wrote: > On May 28, 2005, at 2:09 PM, tmeyer at lps.org wrote: > > >> I have been reading with interest some of the discourse dealing with >> transfering analog VHS and the sort digitally to the Mac. As there >> have been a number of different units said to be quite acceptable, I >> am wondering about a certain aspect. I will be transfering some of >> my VHS tapes that I have recorded but I also have a large number of >> tapes legally purchased for my use that are surely in the stages of >> deterioration that will inevitably be final in years to come. Can >> any of the units mentioned previously copy my commercial VHS tapes >> that were purchased and might have a copy protection built in? >> > > The Canopus ADVC-100 will defeat Macrovision. I don't think any of > the others do, that was one other reason I got the Canopus unit over > others. > > However, I do not know if the ADVC-110 will or not. It seems that > Canopus has discontinued the 100 and is now only selling the 110. > > If you are looking for the specific capability of defeating > Macrovision, you either need to ask Canopus about their 110 or find a > 100 from resellers that still have them in stock. I'm betting that > Canopus probably does not want to advertise that their unit defeats > Macrovision, so they may not be willing to say. Yet, I bet most all > Pro equipment defeats Macrovision.