The confusion occurs when the topic does NOT really change, but a new poster can't resist the urge to improve the subject line by adding a few words or otherwise editing it. --Gordon On 3/7/06, Technophobic_Tom at comcast.net <Technophobic_Tom at comcast.net> wrote: > That's the way it should work if the topic changes. When the topic > changes it's no longer part of the thread so the subject line should > also be changed and a new thread is born. Appending the former > subject as "Was:" allows for those who may wish to discover where the > topic originated to do so by searching the former subject. > > >When posters change the subject line, their message starts off a > >whole new thread, disconnected from the original. I've had some > >threads degenerate into a half dozen or more separate threads, even > >though they were all spawned from the same original. > > > >>TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU. I might add that the SUBJECT: should > >>reflect the content AND should stay the same (not be changed) > >>throughout the life of the thread. > >> > >>>Why don't posters to this list edit out the nonessential? > > > _______________________________________________ > MacDV mailing list > MacDV at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/macdv > > Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random stuff: > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984 > -- Gordon B. Alley http://galley.home.texas.net