I don't know how helpful this would be but saw a few links which may help you in your decision. If it serves your needs, then it's fine of course. I'd be realistic about the image quality. From what I've read about it, it seems that it would appear to be an OK picture when viewed on a TV. And OK on a computer monitor if viewed in a small window (not full screen). A video sample is found at this link. http://tinyurl.com/2p38cm TV does not require very much in the way of image quality so that's why it can look fine on a TV. While computer monitors show much more detail and so what looks OK on a TV can look really grainy on a computer monitor. Conversely; If the file being played has lots and lots of detail, the TV can only show some of it (TV's limited ability to show detail) and the same file shown on a computer monitor can look much better than it did on the TV and can be shown full screen. It is a good question you've asked, we can supply some additional information but.... It is really up to you if the output from the camcorder is sufficient to meet your needs at this time. Regards, Mike :) On Feb 25, 2007, at 3:49 PM, CAM wrote: > Dear Listserver, > > Does anyone have any experience with the video camera: Pure Digital > Point and shoot. See link below. [snip] > -- > Cam > http://zotte -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/pipermail/macdv/attachments/20070225/a43f5925/attachment.html