Hi Mary Ann, I'm Cc'ing this to you directly as the server seems wonky, taking two weeks to respond to posts. You are absolutely right -- go with MiniDV tape if you plan to import and edit. The HD and flash memory cameras are small, give good pictures, and are convenient. HOWEVER, they have onboard hardware to compress the video, and it is HIGHLY compressed. No problem as far as the pictures go, they look great. But your computer doesn't have the dedicated hardware that is built into the cameras. So even just playing the footage needs a much more powerful machine than it takes to play miniDV. The computer has to decompress the video, and then play it as you edit. Huge burden on the computer. And realistically, anything over one track (effect, titles, etc.) will all have to be rendered. Nothing effect wise will be real time any more, because of all the computation needed. Also, while copying files from HD/flash camera is faster than ingesting tape, in many, many cases you will have to convert/transcode the files in order to use them with your editing software. A time consuming hassle. MiniDV will be the nimblest, most efficient in post production. Tim Selander Tokyo, Japan P.S. On your DVD question, yes, paper labels cause lots of problems as you've discovered. We use a Primera Bravo II DVD printer, $2500; and an Epson Disc Publisher, about $4000. We are happier with the Epson. We haven't had the Epson long enough to calculate, but we figure DVDs with a picture and text cost us about 50 cents each just in ink. It is not cheap. Thermal transfer printers have a much lower running cost, but an even higher initial purchase cost. Does your school's art department have silk screening capability? If so, maybe get the art students to do the DVD labels? Just a thought... Mary Ann wrote: > DVD label printer > 1. My students produced a video yearbook and decided to burn the copies at > school instead of sending them out to be duplicated. We used paper labels > (DVD laser ones), but they caused a few problems. Some folks reported they > had to take the label off to make it play or play correctly. > > Looking ahead, if we decide to do this again, can someone suggest a label > printer that would do more than just letters, and would not cost thousands > of dollars? > > On the same topic, is using a great quantity of ink an issue for these types > of machines? > > Advice appreciated. > > Mini-DV tape vs. hard drive camcorder > 2. I am about to buy a new mini-DV camcorder. I've settled on a Canon ZR > 900. I like that the tape loads from the top, and it seems familiar to me as > I'm replacing a Canon ZR 80. > > My husband can't believe that I don't want a hard drive camera or a flash > drive camera instead. My reason is that I've heard that these cameras can't > (or have problems) importing to either/both iMovie and Final Cut Express. > But I'm pretty vague on this. > > Can anyone confirm/explain that staying with mini-DV tape is the way to go > when you have importing and editing as your objective? > > Mary Ann > > > > > _______________________________________________ > MacDV mailing list > MacDV at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/macdv >