<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: 16:9 vs 4:3</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'>DV is about 13GB per hour, whether you shoot 4:3 or 16:9.<BR>
IDVD will hold 2 hours maximum of either.<BR>
<BR>
regards,<BR>
<BR>
sb<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 2/9/05 4:47 PM, "Brett Conlon" <brett_conlon@sonymusic.com.au> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'><BR>
<BR>
3rd time's a charm.... 8-) <BR>
<BR>
I've been shooting in 16:9 recently (trying to look to the future) and I'd love to know what kind of impact it will have on my projects. <BR>
<BR>
For example, approximately how much larger will a 30 min DV capture file to the Mac be compared with a 30 min 4:3 capture file? <BR>
<BR>
In regards to my earlier questions about authoring high quality DVD's, will having 16:9 footage mean I will have to reduce the length of a DVD project to keep the quality up? <BR>
<BR>
Example: <BR>
4:3 single layer DVD = 1hr <BR>
16:9 single layer DVD = x mins <BR>
<BR>
Ta muchly, <BR>
<BR>
Cojcolds <BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>