That's a knee-slapper as some folk say in these parts. <br><br>I'm not so sure that I can provide a lot of technical details why WMV is inferior over then through my own use, which can hardly be called "professional", I get better results using Quicktime.
<br><br>I'm sure you can find some technical details buried in the following link, if I find a good article I'll pass it along:<br><br><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=wmv+vs+quicktime&btnG=Search&complete=1&hl=en&lr=">
http://www.google.com/search?q=wmv+vs+quicktime&btnG=Search&complete=1&hl=en&lr=</a><br><br>Greg<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/17/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Brian Olesky</b> <<a href="mailto:brian4@sbcglobal.net">
brian4@sbcglobal.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On 1/17/07 8:27 AM, "Richard Gilmore" <
<a href="mailto:rgilmor@uwo.ca">rgilmor@uwo.ca</a>> wrote:<br><br>> My boss tells me WMV is the ŗbest video codec˛ out there. I donšt really<br>> believe him but I was wondering about peoplešs opinions on this. How good is
<br>> QT vs WMV?<br><br>Are you sure he didn't say "worst?"<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>MacDV mailing list<br><a href="mailto:MacDV@listserver.themacintoshguy.com">MacDV@listserver.themacintoshguy.com
</a><br><a href="http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/macdv">http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/macdv</a><br><br>Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random stuff:
<br> <a href="http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984">http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984</a><br></blockquote></div><br>