>Save the conversion to 16 bits for CDs for the very last step. >However, I don't have enough experience to know whether this is in >fact a practical consideration. I'm doing everything 24-bit now... the only thing that's really changed for the 'worse' is the file size... my Mac seems to be handling everything fine. I haven't done a test to see how many tracks I can actually record and/or play back at once, but I've never made the processor meters (or my Ultra 160 SCSI drives) sweat yet. The ONLY processor-oriented limitation I've run into so far has been with plug-ins... usually AltiVerb. Another benefit of 24-bit recording - I spend a lot less time worrying about getting mic preamp levels as hot as I can without clipping... with a little more headroom, I'm finding myself hardly EVER sticking my tail between my legs and asking players and singers (and myself) for "one more take for me because we're now playing louder than we did during sound check and my peak LEDs are starting to blink at me". The downside of this is that people who work in 16 bits take a while to get used to the idea of letting something fly with levels that average around -24 and peak at around -6. We're STILL exceeding CD's 96dB of dynamic range, and I just LOVE not having to face digital distortion the next day when I examine tracks. Though it's still fairly new for me, I couldn't be happier with archiving to DVD-R. It took away all my concerns about moving up to 24-bit, and it solved my problem of not being able to archive audio Image Files onto CD-R that were longer than 70 minutes. Plus, it's drastically reducing the amount of physical space required to archive projects. Scott Jacob Loehr