On Wednesday, January 8, 2003, at 03:26 PM, Peter Kirn wrote: > Anyway, this is still not a standalone iDVD. As I learned so gently > when I got flamed for writing a story Saturday in which I quoted CNET > saying this is the first time Apple has charged for upgrades, it > isn't. I should've remembered that iDVD 2 was also a fee upgrade. This > is still an "upgrade" rather than a standalone product -- something > Apple could stand to publicize better. iMovie2 was also a paid upgrade, if I recall correctly.