>Also, I'm in desperate need of a CPU upgrade. My box is a single >550MHz, 1GB, G4 with several SCSI160 drives. It's essentially a Digital >Audio with some customizations. The CPU is killing me though -- it >often pegs during busy mix downs and I have to bump tracks, which kind >of defeats the purpose of a DAW, y'know? :) I know what you mean... I've been running Digital Performer on a 500 mHz, 1.5 GB G4 with Ultra 160 drives. The main CPU killer is reverb... the two that I use the most are RealVerb and AltiVerb. I can get a couple of RealVerbs going with a bunch of EQs and some delay/mod effects, and most of the time, I can get one AltiVerb by itself. There are a couple of Impulse Responses that I can't run. On mixes like these, I'm regularly bouncing tracks with lots of plug-ins to free up the CPU. It doesn't bother me too much, considering what we're getting today for our $$$. However, I did break down and order a Dual 2 gHz G5 the day they were announced... should arrive by September 2nd. Between AltiVerb and GigaSampler files, I'll bring it to its knees!!! :) >I've been eyeing the price drops on chip upgrades and the price points >are getting attractive. But I'm unsure exactly which way to go, >especially when my main app is Cubase SX. I've been looking at the >Powerlogix chips as they seem to have a fairly good rep from what I can >tell. I can't remember who it was... might've been either Mackie or TC Works (I've got both of their PCI cards) or MOTU... but someone advised against getting a processor upgrade card. Check with all your DAW/plug-ins/hardware makers to make sure a CPU card will work. >Is it better to get a single 1.2GHz chip or shoot for say a dual 867 or >933? Can SX take full advantage of the dual processors? I'm not sure I >can spend the bucks for a dual 1.2 upgrade. Everyone I've talked with says to get the dual processor. I don't know about Cubase, but if the software is optimized for it, you'll see substantial speed increases/plug-in count with a DP machine. >I'm also worried about heat output. Already, my G4 bakes my room pretty >well after a few hours. While I suppose the internal fans in the G4 >will keep the box itself cool, I'm worried about my A/C bills :). > >Any insight would be greatly appreciated. > >-Barry Are you using a CRT monitor or an LCD? A CRT will put out tons of heat... I've got a 21" Apple CRT display, and it's like having an extra space heater after it's been on for a while. I turn off the display all the time when I've got something else to take care of at the house, even if it's just for a couple of minutes. The LCD monitors put out a lot less heat and use less A/C. The hard drives are the next culprit... makes me wonder if there's something behind those TV shows and movies that show the Save-The-World-With-My-Computer kids putting their hard drives in a cooler with dry ice. I've just put together an 8-bay external tower... right now, it's got four 73 GB Ultra 160 SCSI drives, and it gets way warm after a few hours of usage. The case has two fans in it; I'm wondering if it might be a good idea to put more fans inside the box and to separate the drives a bit... right now, they're in the top four bays. I've thought about putting them in bays 1, 3, 5, and 7 to give them a little room in between.... Scott Jacob Loehr