On Tuesday, July 13, 2004, at 12:51 PM, KweYao Agyapon wrote: > Why do you see Cubase (SL or SX prolly, since I need the notation > function) as superior to Logic and DP? not superior necessarily... it does work quite well for me... i used SX 1 (all new version had lots broken/missing) - now i use SX 2 (cubase) and all is well. it is stable... the notation Cubase SX is very accessible. It can be simple or complex. VST plugin support is important to me - i need as many audio processing gimmicks as i can get my hands on... to me - Cubase SX is very intuitive. but i have been using midi and audio gear forever - it's my passion... (well the music i work on with it is) as an artist - i do not like to find out that my software does NOT do something. with a couple exceptions Cubase can do it all (the exceptions being concepts i have for improving it - new inventions - but they do not exist in ANY DAW)... > Oh, and do you have any experience/knowledge with/about System 4, > with its integrated (USB) MIDI/audio interface? no - sorry... check out... http://www.harmony-central.com/Software/Mac/sequencing.html do you need pc support too? one nice thing about Logic - if you are a Mac fan - Apple is behind them now.