On 5/10/04 3:14 AM, "Gene Bogart" <gbogart at bellsouth.net> wrote: >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 20:04:46 -0400 >> Subject: USB v FireWire >> From: Bob Alexander <balexan1 at twcny.rr.com> >> Message-Id: <262BBDC4-9FBA-11D8-8E17-000393D28176 at twcny.rr.com> >> >> I bought this G4 tower last year, instead of an imac, because >> it has a PCI slot, which I was told was better for audio. >> ============ > > Hi Bob, > > The "PCI = better for audio" issue was true in the days before FireWire; I'm > running audio (as well as video) streams via FW all the time, and also have > several FW hard drives, and everything runs great. I do a lot of my > professional audio work (voiceover and music recording) on an iMac, and also > use the FW peripherals constantly with my PowerBook. > > Nothing wrong with PCI-input, for sure, but with the advent of FW speeds, > the playing field has been leveled.... It is depending how many tracks you want to play ;o) On my G4 533 MP Motu PCI 424 (2048 MK II + 24i + 1296 + Presonus) I could record 54 tracks at a time. If you record a drum you will need up to 15 mics ! I use only 10 ! I have moved to a G5 2x2 because of QLSO. On the beast you can record up to 96 simultaneous tracks On you Imac I doubt you could do this with a FW 400 interface. I have friends having FW disk, FW audio on a PowerBook that have a lot of problems. If you want to do a song with 10 track a FW will do the job But I have not seen any of this song lately ;o) you get song with 40 track easily ! With a Motu system you can start with one module and add up to 3 (4 in total), so your system can grow with. Thanks in advance. Best regards Cyril Blanc Independent Quantum Leap Symphony orchestra forum (QLSO) for Mac http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qlso A6 Andromeda forum : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/A6_andromeda Petition : ³Support of the APPLE LaserWriter 300 in MAC OS X² http://www.PetitionOnline.com/Ap1c1/petition.html