>I guess the next logical question then would be, is Windows voice >recog software better than the Mac offerings in this point in time? > >If yes, is it enough better to justify the purchase of a Windows >machine? > >Let me be the first to type "that depends!" :-) because of course >it's true that a persons individual situation is the key element >of the equation. > >Really I'm just hoping for a ballpark estimate such as, >is Windows voice recog software 5% better, 25% better, >50% better etc. Or is it not actually better at all? Speech recognition software for Windows has always been ahead of what is available on the Macintosh platform. In fact, the Macintosh platform has still not caught up to wear Windows was in terms of speech recognition back in 1999. I say this as someone who has been using speech recognition since the days of DragonDictate for DOS. If you are someone who is using speech recognition due to a disability and needs a hands-free computing environment Windows, and NaturallySpeaking Professional are what you need. (ViaVoice Pro for Windows also allows total hands-free control of the computer, but it is a bit more cumbersome and does not to support a scripting language.) Even if you were not using speech recognition due to a disability the Macintosh platform simply does not offer speech recognition programs with the combination of features available in Windows speech recognition software. For example, a physician or lawyer could find it very useful to have a speech recognition program which: supports digital recorders, allows you to save audio data so that you can go back and complete documents which cannot be finished in one dictation session, has tight integration with Microsoft Word, supports third party add-on vocabularies, and also allows editing and correction by voice anywhere text can be dictated. This combination of features can only be found on the Windows platform. What's more you have the choice of more than one application that offers this combination of features. Cost is another factor. Speech recognition is extremely demanding application in terms of both processors cycles and memory. If you need to buy a new or hardware keep in mind that you can purchase All of the necessary hardware and software to read Windows-based speech recognition (including a copy of Microsoft Office) for about the same, if not less, then the cost of a new G4. Both NaturallySpeaking Preferred and NaturallySpeaking Professional offer the easiest correction and the best editing by voice of anything else on the market. So if you are someone who dictates several thousand words per day and also needs to perform extensive editing it could well be worth using a Windows machine. If you are going to be writing an extremely long document such as a book then NaturallySpeaking Professional is your best choice. It is the only program on the market that has the editing and correction capabilities of NaturallySpeaking coupled with the ability to save audio data. (ViaVoice Pro for Windows can save audio data too; but it's easier to correct and edit in NaturallySpeaking.) If you use speech recognition we simply as a means to avoid typing (or are disabled but do not need a completely hands-free computing environment) then either ViaVoice or iListen will suit your needs. It then comes down to choosing and which one best suits the way you wish to work. Every speech recognition program, both Macintosh and Windows, has its own idiosyncrasies which must be dealt with. I am not saying that you should not use Macintosh based speech recognition. But it simply does not measure op to what is available on the Windows platform. For some people it is worth the expense of purchasing a PC in order to run speech recognition, and for others it is not. You cannot really assign a simple percentage value. Both iListen version 1.6 and ViaVoice for Mac OS X will allow way user with a well trained voice profile to dictate text at approximately 100 words per minute with a 98% accuracy rate. I say approximately 100 words per minute for two reasons: that sort of speed is only available with ViaVoice when using SpeakPad, and you must slow iListen down in some applications to avoid scrambling your text. ViaVoice does have that tendency to periodically go deaf, making it necessary to restart the program. If you first save your work, including the audio data (ViaVoice refers to this as saving the dictation session.) You will be able to resume right where you left off and still be able to correct or edit by voice. Assuming you were dictating into SpeakPad. Dictating into anything but SpeakPad when using ViaVoice his excruciatingly slow. With ViaVoice you can only correct or edit by voice in SpeakPad. Only iListen supports digital recorders on the Macintosh. iListen will periodically crash on some people's systems when used with some applications. I am sure MacSpeech is working to resolve this. These days I find a myself using iListen unless I am working on a longer document, one in which have most frequently use either spelling the mode or text macros, or I must edit text that I have not to dictated but have instead imported from another source. (The presence of preexisting text can confuse iListen leading to scrambled text.) ViaVoice has advantages over iListen in the following situations: Documents which require the frequent use of text macros or text entered through the use of spelling mode. Currently iListen does not properly track text entered into a document by either of these means. This can lead to problems later when either editing or correcting recognition errors (basically the document text gets scrambled). There is a work around for this involving using the "Commit Corrections" command. However doing so the means you lose the ability to edit by voice any text dictated prior to the use of this command. It also means you must issue extra commands before resuming dictation since by default there will be no space between the previously dictated text and the new text; in addition to this the first word dictated will be capitalized. So for example, even with the new improvements, iListen would not be appropriate for the gentleman who wished to use speech recognition to dictate DNA sequences. And I myself do not use iListen if I am going to be dictating a document that frequently contains Unix commands since this requires either text macros or the use of the spelling mode. Since iListen lacks the ability to save audio data it isn't appropriate for documents that you cannot complete in a single dictation session. Once you exit iListen (or issue the "Commit Corrections" command) all audio data prior to that point is lost. This means you could not go back at a later date and either correct recognition errors in the previously dictated text or edit by voice. Since I depend on speech recognition due to problems with my hands we ViaVoice is definitely a necessity in this situation. A legal or medical professional can take advantage of specialized vocabularies available for ViaVoice. These vocabularies can both tremendously increase accuracy and shorten training time for those who use them. This definitely makes it worth considering the ViaVoice instead of iListen for such professionals. For information on these vocabularies see: <http://www-3.ibm.com/software/speech/mac/osx/vocabs.html> When it comes to command-and-control ViaVoice provides the user two options should they wish to create their own voice commands: keystroke macros (which do have some limitations) or AppleScript. By contrast iListen is entirely dependent upon AppleScript for creation of voice commands. This makes ViaVoice a better choice for those who want to create their own voice commands but do not know, or wish to learn, AppleScript. Finally, a user may occasionally encounter program which simply does not work well with iListen. In which case ViaVoice is the only other option for speech recognition under OS X. -- ---------- T. Patrick Henebry