Wyldceltic1 wrote: > I was three month preemie and parked in an incubator of pure oxygen > and lights. My retina apparently took umbrage at this and went on strike. > > Consequently, I've been very visually impaired from 'day one' so to > speak. I'm told by my retinologist that what ppl see normally at 20 > feet I would see the same thing at 2 feet. > > I have been trying to touch type and am somewhat getting it, but I > really would be kinder to my wrists and so on if I could just dictate > and my Mac would type for me. I hear disparaging things about Voice to > Texy software, but that the mic and headset type do make a difference. > I need to know what I should be looking at in these: iListen is fast at dictating and relatively accurate. However, even if you're lucky and manage to get a 95% accuracy rate, most of your sentences will still contain one or two errors and require correction, and it is this that makes speech recognition much slower than touch typing. If you're blind I imagine the correction process is much slower than for a sighted person (because you need screen reader software to read your sentence back to you). You really need to talk to other blind users to confirm this, but I imagine you would be far better learning to touch type. I don't know how good screen reader software is on the Mac, but it would be my guess that the Mac is not the best platform for blind users. A GUI is by definition graphical, i.e. visual. I would suggest you try an entirely textual based system such as Linux. There is quite a lot of free software available for Linux aimed specifically at blind users: http://www.linux-speakup.org/ http://leb.net/blinux/ Linux can be used with a Braille display http://www.mielke.cc/brltty/ On the other hand, Apple are planning to integrate a screen reader into Tiger if you can wait for that: http://www.apple.com/accessibility/voiceover/ -- Richard