I think if you invest enough time teaching iListen your style and feed it enough documents with your medical vocabulary, you will find it much better than previous versions. It is *so* different from DNS that a comparison is unfair, IMO, from product maturity and OS limitations, but it is very workable and trainable for the most part. Standard text dictation is much quicker than previous versions, but it takes a lot of time and dedication to add in a wide array of proper names and medical terms if not brought in early through learning my writing style. Like you, I am a hard core Mac User, but my disability and medical dictation have me use my Windows box for those lengthier straight medical documents. Due to mail and security issues and viruses and other horrors on PC's, I use iListen for all that. The result is no more problems on the PC with no email and Internet downloads. Let us know your experience if you decide to play with iListen. The more feedback developers get, the better the product will be. Valerie Check out my kids at: http://www.caringbridge.org/ms/nicholemaples http://www.caringbridge.org/ms/cindymaples http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/jorgemaples On Sep 5, 2006, at 2:03 PM, Antivenom at aol.com wrote: > I bought a $180 sony digital voice recorder and it came with a free > copy of DNS 8 preferred. I was so blown away by the accuracy that > I purchased DNS 9 Medical. I have used ilisten and VV in the past > but found that I was spending too much time on corrections. I have > not tried. iListen 1.7 yet, although I have been a beta tester for > them in the past. As a hard-core Mac addict, I am really hoping > that 1.7 works for me. Currently I am using DNS 9 medical on a > Windows machine, and DNS 8 preferred on a Mac book Pro running > parallels.