Chuck- Thanks for the fast answers! On 22-Jan-08, at 12:49 PM, Chuck Rogers wrote: > Damien (and everyone else): > > First, let me make one thing very clear: this is not "Dragon on the > Mac." So don't expect everything to work the way Dragon > NaturallySpeaking does. There is not one line of code from the > Dragon NaturallySpeaking program in MacSpeech Dictate. Any > similarities between the two programs (other than the amazing > accuracy) will be because that is simply the best way to do > something, not because Dragon does it that way. > sounds good-- dragon is a windows app, after all! > To answer your questions specifically: > >> 1) How are words added? With the old phonetic editor, or with >> Dragon's (and ViaVoice's) "type it out and record your >> pronunciation" system? > Right now, words are added through Vocabulary Training. Additional > features for adding words will be added in a later version. >> >> 2) How does correction function? Is it like Dragon's "say and >> replace" that can be done while working on the document? > Version 1.0 will not have a traditional Correction interface. You > correct mis-recognitions by selecting the mis-recognized word or > phrase and then either re-speak it or type it in manually. (You can > select by voice, btw.) We are totally re-inventing the way we do > Correction compared to iListen, and we are taking the time to do it > right. We will offer Correction features in a free upgrade. > sounds like the same function as the part(s) of dragon that I find works so well-- i like correcting right away. >> 3) Will there be special plugins for Word/Pages/etc, like Dragon, >> so that Dictate can work flawlessly in those apps, just like it >> will in the included Dictate Notepad? > Right now we are concentrating on getting version 1.0 out the door. > After that, our focus will be Correction. It is too early to > speculate on what applications will be supported with Correction. > Best Regards, > > Chuck Rogers, Chief Evangelist > MacSpeech, Inc. With respect, then it sounds like a late Beta rather than a 1.0. Not to nitpick, but as a strong supporter of MacSpeech, I would rather have expectations that match the product-- i.e. "wow, what a great beta, can't wait for 1.0", rather than "wow, 1.0 is lame, wish I had waited for 1.1, or 2.0". Still, the code shipping next month will be the same either way. -damien