> Well, no, what someone said was along the lines of "correct me if I'm > wrong..." - and the person is mostly wrong. > > Just try buying a new 3 GHz P4 from Dell and then try to put DOS on it. > You'll run into any number of problems, most of which will be insurmountable > for the average users. Simple things like: > First of all, I was not talking about the average user. As you might have noticed the person complaining seems to be a music professional who just wants a computer that can do all kind of new things (with OS X) but at the same time still be able to do the things he used to do with his old computer. The same goes for my statement about DOS. Also I never stated I wanted to watch DVD's under DOS. I just wanted to run old DOS stuff that always ran under DOS run under DOS but slightly faster, and I am fine with only accessing the disk space I used to. Its not about making DOS or System 9 better. Its about backward compatibility. Many people invested large amounts of money in the software and external hardware they purchased and now because they bought a new laptop they won't be able to use it anymore? It makes the argument that OSX is so much better and lets you do so much more stuff sound very weak, if, in order to do so, I have to rebuy everything I owned before. This whole discussion could be extended to hardware and interfaces. Many PC laptops still have middle age serial and parallel ports and you might be able to hook some $5 keyboard or mouse to it (not to talk about all that neat little robot and handmade peripherial stuff you can find on the net). With the Ti the average user is forced to use USB and firewire ($15 for a mouse $40 for a keyboard). And I still do not quite understand where the advantages are of a USB Mouse or Keyboard to a the old ADB style ones (except for the Hot Swapping).