Hi guys, Not to be nitpicking here, but there are big differences btw winXP pc's too... Mine AMD 1200 have no problem to rip a CD and listen to it at the same time (using RealPlayer One which is a great & nice looking program too... hehe) and there are absoultely no "hangs" when I browse on the net, download doozen files from Kazaa and watch a divx film at the same time... Wounder what crap pc's u'r friends have :) since my 1 & 1/2 year old pc can do all this. Daniel >> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 08:08:48 -0800 >> Subject: [Ti] x86 vs. ppc >> From: coccolithophorid at earthlink.net >> Message-Id: <2A0FA40C-0EB5-11D7-A420-003065F6C60E at earthlink.net> >> >> > > [...] >> in my experience, using XP >> straight out of the box on a 1 + gHz machine with 256 MB RAM seems slow >> when compared to my 500 mHz TiBook. How can that be? When I use a >> computer I don't think about how many applications I'm limited to >> opening (I haven't had to since os X) or how much processing the >> computer is capable of. I usually have 5 or so apps open and a lot of >> the time they are all doing something, When I use XP I am limited by >> the bad design, I bog down the computer when I try to use it the way I >> use my Mac, if iMovie is rendering a transition I go read my web sites, >> if iTunes is converting 300 AIFF's into 320 kbps mp3's then I go check >> my email, oh I can see by the progress bar in the dock that iMovie is >> almost done rendering, back to working on my movie. This way of working >> on a PC usually freezes Windows XP. Using a computer efficiently on os >> X is not the same as using a computer efficiently on XP, at least in my >> experience. > > -- Massimo Marino NERSC Division - HPC Department Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~marino On leave at CERN, CH, EP Division, Atlas experiment phone: (+41) 22 767-1288 fax: (+41) 22 767-8350 Office: 40-3-D16 alternate email: marino at slac.stanford.edu, marino at mail.cern.ch, Massimo.Marino at cern.ch ------------------------------