On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 01:41 AM, alan kastner wrote: > but the extremely high areal density that allows 30GB (27.78 > formatted?) per platter Y'know - i never thought about that before... as the data density goes up, the data read/write rate would go up as well - regardless of the platter staying @ 4200 rpm... or 5400... so even if the platters aren't spinning any faster, the data, being at a much higher density, is whizzing past the read head way faster... and with those platters being so tiny... i bet that that data on a 60Gig 4200rpm 2.5" drive is read even faster than the data on a 60Gig 3.5" 4200rpm drive... makes sense, but is it true? --- http://www.mp3.com/lukeetyrnal (music no one likes) etyrnal at ameritech.net