On Sunday, December 29, 2002, at 08:01 AM, Paul Russell wrote: >> > Not really - if someone has physical access to the machine then the OS > security is a moot point. If they don't have physical access then > they're not going to be able to start Classic, and even if Classic is > running, how does this make the machine any less secure ? os 9 doesn't care about os x's permissions. it'll let you do anything you want within an x installation... --- http://www.mp3.com/lukeetyrnal (music no one likes) etyrnal at ameritech.net