On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 12:35:55PM -0500, NaegeleWDC at aol.com wrote: > > As the site to which Mike referred says, we can access the Internet > anywhere our Ti's with Airport "sense" nearby wireless access, right? > Is any one of you using this now? If so, is Airport all you need to > connect? > In a sense. One can only connect to wireless networks that are "open"; i.e., that are not using WEP, that provide an SSID beacon, and do not have any other form of host and/or user authentication (e.g., MAC-based access restriction, VPN requirements, the various methods used to triangulate a client's location and allow/disallow based on physical distance from the access point, etc.) 802.11b is somewhat confusing to laypeople in that it is entirely possible to be "connected" in the trivial sense, yet still not be able to use the network. This is because 802.11b uses a two-step process for network access: Association (this is the point at which your system may "see" a wireless network and it will appear to be connected to it), and Authentication (this is the point at which the access point -- or some system conomitant with or subsequent to it -- grants you permission to use the network, and begins passing packets to and from your system). This often trips people up, with complaints of, "I'm connected to the network, but nothing works." For fully open networks (as indicated by various warchalking activities), yes, your Airport-equipped Tibook is all you need. However, I must echo another person's caveat: Do so at your own risk. I've heard from various individuals representing various agencies, including federal prosecutors and the special advisor to the POTUS, that using another's wireless network (and the associated behaviors, such as war*ing) is in violation of several federal laws. And quite possibly compounded by the unauthorized access to the network behind said wireless connection, both private and public. Given various interpretations of recently-enacted legislation, the penalties for such access include both life imprisonment and death, and you may be deprived of due process, should someone want to press the issue. This is a dangerous time to be treading lightly in grey areas created by emerging technology (I'm well aware that 802.11? is not new; however, it's still novel to the masses, particularly those who deal with litigation, and those who are in a position to demand such.) -- Mark C. Langston Sr. Unix SysAdmin mark at bitshift.org mark at seti.org Systems & Network Admin SETI Institute http://bitshift.org http://www.seti.org