>An interesting exchange between Leo and Patrick's stand-in last night. >Apparently they have some inside info that seems to imply that Macs will >soon be sporting Intel processors. Jobs was the keynote speaker at a recent >Intel conference and seemed quite chummy with the execs there. Conjecture by >Leo was that within 6 to 8 months there will be a platform release with >Intel chips, either for dual booting (with PowerPCs still aboard) or as the >sole processor, with the ROMs set up to accommodate Pentium/OS X >compatibility. > >Interesting stuff, but what happened to IBM's G4 970. And for that matter >the G5? Can't recall where I read this (came over a Watson/Meerkat newsfeed), but adding substance to that rumor is that OSX will only run on the new Itanium chip, to prevent Pentium users from reverse engineering the OS. It fits with Jobs' "new and whizzy" approach to things; also the article noted that since Apple pulled the clone agreement with Motorola, there has been bad blood, hence the G5 chip being over a year and a half late on projected release; Motorola has also been slow in producing chips which has caused some production wrinkles in current Apple lines... not sure about the IBM version. IMHO, Apple blew a divine opportunity in the server market before IBM shifted to Linux... an agreement for IBM to produce SERVER ONLY versions running OSX would have given Apple instant credibility in the server market while not competing with there lucrative consumer end... IBM has never liked dealing with M$ and there shift to Linux is definitive proof that Apple could have stepped to the plate there and simply blew it. -- <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Mike Bigley Maineville, Ohio http://www.norbertrunning.com Please support an American Indian Elder & Medicine Man by visiting the above link. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>