On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 10:07 pm, Jerry Krinock wrote: > on 03/04/02 12:39, luke at etyrnal at ameritech.net wrote: > >> Just negligent programming in apple's part... >> >> if the tibook has a way to sense a valid cat-5 or airport connection >> and it knows that one or both of those 'physical' connections are lost >> it should be smart enough to KNOW that any remote mount/filesystem etc >> is - hello?? - no longer available. >> > > That's not quite the problem. The problem is when the physical > connection > is still there but the remote server is no longer on the network. > Here are > the actual problems: > > 1. Searching for a remote server should not hog 99% of the CPU. I agree > > 2. There should be a timeout. Hello - if you don't answer after 60 > seconds > I conclude that you're not there and abort. Let's make it 30. Or even better configurable. -- Tarik Bilgin Opalblue tarik at opalblue.com