On 4/9/03 19:04, "b" wrote: > 46, too old? it might have been Tolstoy, whose first novel was still > 14 years away, at that point in his life, or others, that reminds me > that age is irrelevant. I hope you won't fall for the 'myth' of age, > or let a few bad apples in a large company's retail system, rob you > of what sounds like a great deal for the Apple store's future clients. On 4/9/03 21:22, "Tom R. no spam" wrote: > Who, besides "mgrs" who aren't > "comfortable" managing people older than themselves, worries > about age etc rather than competence and flexibility? Just to be clear, the "too old" comment was from my wife (trying to be helpful, not ragging). This would be illegal for the store management to say. What they did say was "At this time, we are moving forward with only a small group that meets the needs of the business today." Now I do have a somewhat restricted schedule at this time (though they said being available evening and weekends was a plus) and not many hours, so it may be that I just wasn't going to fit the schedule. Funny thing, I'm still getting auto emails from the Apple web site telling me of job opportunities. Thanks for the support. Oh well, when the store opens I will get a place to bring the kids - they have fun with the demo kids programs, and they are probably responsible for more people buying Macs than most sales people. ("Are Macs easy to use?" "Sure, give my 2 year old this CD-ROM and let him show you." "Watch him go to NickJr.com. "Let my six year old show you how to search the web.") -- Roger