On 4/18/03 11:27 AM, "Don" <ds1000309 at uid.onemain.com> wrote: > I've owned and used Macs since I purchased a new 512ke. Never been one to > always > update systems (I generally stay with whatever came installed on the box) so I > wonder, > have there been so many buggy issues with previous system releases... systems > prior to > X? Every time I feel about ready to make the upgrade leap from 9, the list > seems to > fill up with discussions of problems, bugs and glitches users of X are > having... and I > really don't relish the thought of dealing with all the apparent issues, > especially as > my 'book works flawlessly with the original 9.1 installed. So is X unusual in > this > respect or have I just not been aware of similar problems when earlier system > releases > were made? X Rocks--- for every flaw it has, there are 20 reasons it's better than 9. I've been using X exclusively since the first public beta, and I've had a grand total of 2 crashes (and, as anyone who knows me can tell you, I push my computers to the limits-- you'll never find my computer with fewer than 10 apps open, usually over 15 or 20, usually including photoshop, 2 or 3 browsers, flash, dreamweaver, word, entourage, and a couple processes going on in the terminal). X handles everything I throw at it flawlessly-- and, thanks to 10.2, our print server finally works flawlessly. -- Samuel W. Hotchkiss President, Contractor Services, LLC. hotch at zlit.net Laptop History: PB 145, PB 520c, PB 3400c, 400mhz Pismo, 400mhz TiBook, 667mhz TiBook (rev b), 1ghz TiBook