I agree with Trevor. The predominant demographic for music sales are people under 35. Music sharing and trading will always exist with this crowd and most of them are internet savvy. If they are going to be given a decent alternative to "stealing" music then they are going to need incentive. Most CD retailers sale CD's for $10 - $15 and there are an average of 10 - 15 tracks per CD. Most consumers see that as $1.00 per song. You get art work, permanent archive storage of CD, convenience of around the corner shopping, something you can trade and sell legally, excellent quality reproduction. Where as Apple's system yields no price per song discount, no artwork, no storage medium, inferior but good quality reproduction and no legal rights to sale or trade. Convenience is debatable depending on reliability and bandwidth of internet connection vs. proximity to store and depth of song selection catalogs. The only clear advantage that Apple's service has is selection of individual tracks but I think that advantage is lost on the consumer who realizes that the cost of reproduction of an entire CD is much more than offering downloads of the same. In addition I have a tangible item that I can legally sale and trade. The download is illegal to sale or trade. A much better pricing scenario is $.25 - to $.50 per song or better yet prorated out on a per minute basis because some songs may be 20 minutes while others are 1 minute 30 seconds. This looks very much like a bomb! Similar to many of the other music services that are failing. But we will see. If anyone can fix it, I do trust Apple to make it work properly. Greg