>Bill - I am surprised to see you write "most people are on it" (dialup). >Is that in fact the case? >I moved from dialup, where I had similar agonies, to ISDN connection >3 years ago and then to DSL late last summer. While those of us who have switched to broadband never look back and can't understand why the whole world isn't with us, the fact is that statistically only about a third of net users have broadband. It is still a dial up world (much to the chagrin of web developers). This is not completely attributable to financial or "fear of change" considerations. Broadband is simply not being offered to 100% of the people; for some, it will never be available commercially because population density doesn't warrant the providers a cost-benefit. The only solution for them is about $1,000 worth of equipment and $100-130 a month for satellite service... something that is clearly less for more. I have been looking for a new place to live and, of course, one of my requirements is broadband availability and I am quite surprised at the lack of availability, even in areas that I would not classify as rural. For example, DSL requires a maximum distance of 18,000 feet from a switch; even in suburbs there can be "dead zones" that are beyond that from any switch. -- <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Mike Bigley Maineville, Ohio http://www.norbertrunning.com Please support an American Indian Elder & Medicine Man by visiting the above link. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>