On Tuesday, April 29, 2003, at 01:15 PM, Shawn King wrote: > On 4/28/03 3:36 PM, "Sam Hotchkiss" <ti at zlit.net> wrote: > >> On 4/28/03 2:29 PM, "Trevor J. Hutley" <hutley at geneva-link.ch> wrote: >> >>> >>> How do others see the price aspect of this innovation? >> >> I agree with you 100%... Apple needs to either price individual tracks >> SIGNIFICANTLY cheaper or provide it in blocks: $20/month gets you 100 >> songs. >> As there are no (significant) costs relating to actual production >> once the >> artist is finished with it, apple has no reason to charge $1 a track >> and >> they know it. > > Apple has one huge reason - that's the price people are willing to pay. Which "people" are you referring to Shawn? Do you have any evidence supporting this claim? > Why price it at $0.50 when people are willing to pay $0.99 and leave > $0.49 > on the table? LOL - listen to yourself - who exactly was polled and asked how much they were willing to pay? Personally, I have no problem plunking down a buck or two for a few good songs off of a dud of an album.