> >...and then there are three genders, not necessarily divided nicely >into the five >declensions, or related to the meanings of the words, or reliably >identified by word >endings. Then adjective agreement (gender, case and number - not >necessarily the same >endings as the nouns they agree with either, if in a different >declension), the >conjugations with their myriad tenses, sentence meaning influenced >by word order, the >subjunctive, the imperative, irregular verbs (not to mention >irregular bloody nouns >IMHO), unpredictable adverbs, unbelievable terseness and worst of >all, Latin idiom, >which, although one may 'know' every single word in a Latin >sentence, can render the >sentence unintelligible or at the very least, ambiguous, until one >has waded through >simply reams and reams of original Latin written by oringinal >Romans....have I missed >anything, Paul?....and I study this language out of CHOICE!!! >Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhh.................eheu, demens sum. > Heh - that's a pretty good summary Erika. It's twenty odd years since I studied Latin, but it's amazing how the noun declensions etc are still hard-wired in my brain, long after more relevant and potentially important stuff has faded away. Must be something to do with those antiquated teaching methods - a sharp rap across the knuckles with a wooden ruler helps to focus the mind wonderfully. ;-) Vale, Paulus --