<Snippity snip snip snip> >On 4/29/03 7:45 PM, "Shawn King" <shawn at yourmaclife.com> wrote: >> >> Don't ruffle your feathers too much, SK, I'm sure he was going to cite it > > No, he wasn't. He *said* he was going to "cut-and-paste this article and > send it on Friday, for those who don't get the WSJ". > > And whenever I see people stealing, it "ruffles my feathers". Sorry you > don't feel the same way. > > Shawn King Coming from a lawyer I would imagine he is well aware of how copyright works (can't assume though!?) I know that in many cases an original artists/writers/authors work is allowed to be 'reproduced' as long as all relevant links and credit is given where due. Given that this is probably the property of the WSJ and not the original author's, it could cause some problems. I am sure there is a legal mention of this on WSJ's website. The typical disclaimer would apply. Frankly I don't give a damn though and appreciate not having to submit my email address to a spam machine disguised as login access to 'exclusive material' (that point is the only reason why I reply here to the Ti list and not personally). Don't participate in reading the 'plagiarized' quote if you don't want to, but unless you're calling the WSJ to rat him out, why fight about it here? If you have a problem with someone - be a man and take it up with him. If you have already have, good for you. Shouting matches in the playground serve absolutely no purpose whatsoever and make everyone involved look, well, foolish. Sorry Shawn, I know that you know a lot more than most and I legitimately appreciate your insight and experience - but sometimes to me, you come across as a know it all. And you have already humbly and elegantly proved that you do not. Maybe I am too laid back, but I find people who let others' actions get to them lead short lives. Why stress it? Just my .02cents worth (don't ask me what that's worth after the exchange) Bill Reburn Associate Member of the Society of Graphic Designers of Canada