> > No, he wasn't. He *said* he was going to "cut-and-paste this article and >> send it on Friday, for those who don't get the WSJ". > >Is it impossible to cut and paste an article, then cite it? > >FYI, Mr. Naegele is an attorney-- I doubt he's going to try to pass off a >WSJ article as his own work > IF you put 50 cents in a newspaper box and take two newspapers, you are stealing one of them (presuming the cost of the paper is 50 cents). It is a small crime, but it is stealing all the same. Going into a site that requires payment and pasting an article from that pay site into a mailing list is not different in the act, in fact it is more like stealing a truck full of newspapers. Attorney or not, copyright violation is stealing. Now, if Mr. Naegele gets permission from the WSJ or the author of the article to reprint it, that is fine; it is also (usually) appropriate for someone to post a paragraph or two along with a link to the entire article. However, from the WSJ subscription agreement: "c. You agree not to create abstracts from, scrape or display headlines from our content for use on another web site or service. You agree not to post any content from WSJ.com to newsgroups, mail lists or electronic bulletin boards, without our written consent." So even an abstract of an article posted to this list is a violation of copyright law (as stated earlier in their subscription agreement). -- <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Mike Bigley Maineville, Ohio http://www.norbertrunning.com Please support an American Indian Elder & Medicine Man by visiting the above link. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>