>>What are the best alternative you have found, esp. in >>the realm of hybrid connectivity (PC and Macs sharing >>the same wireless connection). Cost is not an issue; >>however, quality and realiability are. I'm not on >>802-g, but a router that has that flexibility built in >>is a plus. here is my brief, layman's overview of wireless, based on installing 5 wireless networks for home and/or small business use. While this in no way makes me an expert, it has required me to read a few tech notes, spend some time with various tech support and generally figure out how to get bits to play well with each other. 802.11b vs. 802.11g: First, the trade off between version b and g speed is distance; on Apple's new Airport Xtreme, g distance drops to 50 feet (150 feet for b); similar drops in distance are standard in other routers that offer both b and g. Version b operates at 10baseT ethernet speed, so even with a fast broadband connection, speed differences "might" be noticed with 4 or more computers continuously downloading files. While there have been some anecdotal reports of speed increases with version g, these or more likely caused by poor signal or other factors rather than the actual change in signal. Version g is advantageous in small offices because shared connections are generally within the range of g and often require 4 or more devices. In addition, filesharing between those computers could also benefit from the fast g connection, which I believe is 100baseT ethernet equivalent. One way to offset the distance loss with the new Airport X as well as most newer wireless routers is with an external antenna; these can be had starting at about $70. Most wireless routers come with external antennae, which is why their distance ratings are much higher than Airport X out of the box Compatibility: Since the 802.11 is an adopted standard (pioneered by Apple) in wireless data transfer, there should be no problem connecting wireless devices. HAHAHAHAHA! While I have found this to be almost true, there are some issues with WEP (wireless encryption protocol). We put a Linksys wireless PC card in a Windows laptop and tried connecting to the Airport Extreme network. Including and hour with Linksys tech support, we could find no way to connect to the Airport with WEP enabled. This client chose to keep WEP disabled, as it was a home network, and they used non-trivial passwords on all their devices leaving only the actual wireless connection open; if someone wanted to warchalk their wireless connection they would have to park obviously on their suburban side street. I am currently using DLink products in my home and office network, and there is no problem with WEP from them to Macs; so whether this is an Apple issue or a Linksys issue or a Windows issue, unfortunately it would be a mark against the Airport Extreme if your Windows devices are using (at least some)Linksys products and you require a secure network. Comparisons: I am an Apple Evangelist and I really like the look of the new Airport, but there are only 2 advantages to the Airport that make it worth its EXTREME price: - Style (if your wireless network is in your living room and you don't want some ugly tin/plastic box hanging on your wall.) - USB printer sharing. The USB/Rendezvous connection on the Airport makes sharing a USB printer a breeze (and yes, the Windows laptop could print to the device too). However, a note to those with "All-in-one" printers, only the print functions work. The scan/fax software looks to the physical USB port for the device. I am currently a big fan of DLink products; their support is average, but it is generally average. Their Mac support seems equal to their Windoze support. They have a wireless router that is browser configurable, has 4 additional ethernet ports for non-wireless connections and two external antennae for around $70. This router also supports bridging, which is also supported in the new Airport Extremes, but not in older Airport Base stations. Bridging is connecting two or more networks wirelessly. If this is something that is important to you, make sure to check the wireless device SPECIFICALLY for that feature as most cheaper routers DO NOT support bridging. An example where bridging is needed: my house and my office are separated by about 100 feet, though on the same property. I have multiple computers in both locations, so I connected wirelessly between the two buildings using a bridge. Here are a few links if you want more info: <http://www.macwireless.com/> <http://www.warchalking.org/> <http://www.psand.net/clan/> <http://flakey.info/> <http://www.bristolwireless.net/index.php> <http://www.cantenna.com/> Hope this helps in your decision-making. -- <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Mike Bigley Maineville, Ohio http://www.norbertrunning.com Please support an American Indian Elder & Medicine Man by visiting the above link. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>