At 10:00 -0500 7-2-2003, Malcolm Hamilton wrote: >Hello - >thanks to those who've weighed in on the subject of getting rid of >the Dock. I've found a little app on VersionTracker called >'dock-a-bye', which claims to do just this. I'll try it when I get >the chance and get back to the list. > >Another question I'd love to revisit, regarding hard drives: I have >a 400MHz Titanium, whose 10GB int. drive is almost full. I want to >get a 40GB drive to replace it with - - should I get the 4200 rpm or >5400 rpm Travelstar? I remember a discussion about this a while >ago, but it quickly got too technical for me. What's the bottom >line, please? Which is faster, more dependable? >If the 5400 is indeed faster, generally, what about specifically - - >would my 400MHz processor be able to make use of the extra speed of >the 5400 rpm? > >Just in case it matters: I use my Titanium for mostly regular >things, but will shortly be doing some video editing on a G4 tower. >I'll probably want to take the odd project on the road with me - - >this would involve using an ext. firewire drive, but the project >files would have to be on my internal drive. I know for video, >faster is usually better, but I still don't know if the 5400 is >faster generally, or, in the case of my 400MHz, specifically. Malcolm - I have a Ti-500 and upgraded my HD to the IBM Travelstar 40 GNX, which is a 5400 rpm drive. My view is that I always need some aspect of my Ti-book to run FASTER, so buying a faster disk made sense to me. Since OS X uses the disk quite a lot (virtual memory), a faster disk will likely speed up this aspect. I do no video work (yet) so this was not an issue for me. I will add more RAM (I have 512 Mb at the moment, but I expect that 768 or 1024 Mb will speed things up a little - due to less need for virtual memory, less spinning beach ball intervals,....). Small speed increments have also come from the OS X updates. I eagerly wait 10.2.4, to see if that helps a little...... regards, Trevor