At 11:50 -0500 9-2-2003, William Benton wrote: >My Ti 400, 40GB IBM GNX Drive, 384 MB RAM, OS 10.2.3 runs like a >snail. Would more RAM help? I am aware that the vid requirements are >not met by this machine but Jag still runs better than any other >OSX. Finder speed is my problem. Willy - my Ti-500/IBM 40 Gb GNX 5400 rpm drive/512 Mb RAM/OS 10.2.3 runs pretty well, in terms of Finder speed. (Of course, it could always be faster, and I look for every increment of speed). I have the 5400 drive. I will increase my RAM (soon) to 768. I often run Repair Permissions. I run System Optimizer X 3.1.4 every few weeks. I also re-boot in Classic every few weeks and run Disk Warrior (rebuild directories, de-fragment disks). That is my regular "maintenance schedule"! I think that if I was you, and none of the above helped, that I would make a complete back-up, erase the hard drive totally, re-install the OS, restore everything from the backup. Not forgetting to keep the backup catalogue and backup software somewhere, that is somewhere apart from in the backup. I have two ways that I measure "speed" on my Ti-500. (1) Start-up time: from when the Apple first appears on the grey screen to when the first icons in my Dock start jumping ( I have some that launch at start-up, eg Folding at Home). When I measure this time - with my stop-watch - it is below 1 min 30 sec; and in the best case gets as low as 1 min 4 sec. (2) I use AltiVec Fractal Carbon 1.1.2 (under Classic) to measure (one aspect of) my Ti-500 speed. This gives me (I just ran it) 1.584 Gigaflops. It was breaking the 1 Gigaflop barrier that earned the Ti-500 as a supercomputer-to-go status. based on this metric, I believe that th latest Powerbooks are 5X as fast as mine. HTH regards, Trevor